I continue to enjoy reading this book even though many of my group mates begin to lose interest. After reaching to the second paper clip, I thought that Chris (Alex Supertramp) McCandless lived an abnormal life but it seemed reasonable that happened to him. In the beginning of the section, Krakauer reported on a couple of other people that had also ended up similar to Alex; they arrive in Alaska to start a new life in the wild but ends in death.
I believed that Chris had lived an abnormal life because he didn't want to be successful in college but rather explore nature. He ran away from home. He enjoyed being by himself much more that hanging out with the friends that he makes. He donated all his money instead of using it on his trips. On the other hand, I also thought that it was reasonable because he had many family problems. The parents constantly yelled at each other so only his sister was close to him. If his sister wasn't there, then he would be by himself. He was also influenced by a writer named Jack London that expressed the fantasies of living in Alaska.
In our lit circle discussion, we also discussed about what would have happen if he had survived and was rescued by the Alaska state troopers. We said that he could have been traumatized by the course of events and would not go back into the wild again or at least Alaska. We believe that Chris McCandless would have settled down in Carthage and make a family. He would continue to work for Wayne Westernberg in the mills or become someone popular like his father, Walt. He might have become the veteran's adopted son and live with him for the rest of his life.
Throughout this book, our group thought that Alex actually wanted to come back and that his death was something unexpected to him even though he had entered with very little gear. He had promised many things to other people in his letters to them that he would survive and come back to meet them.
stuff i write about
ability
(1)
addiction
(1)
adventure
(2)
Alameda city
(1)
Alameda science and technology institute
(1)
Alaska
(1)
America
(2)
analysis
(1)
Animal Farm
(1)
ASTI constitution
(1)
attitude
(1)
Blogger
(1)
blogging
(1)
bond
(1)
books
(7)
boredom
(1)
budget cuts
(1)
bullying
(4)
California
(1)
capability
(1)
carbon dioxide
(1)
cheating
(1)
college
(2)
college classes
(1)
college readiness
(2)
comparison
(1)
confusion
(1)
death
(1)
debate
(1)
diet
(1)
difference
(1)
distraction
(1)
Dominican Republic
(1)
earth
(1)
education
(2)
Elie weisel
(1)
escape
(1)
essay
(2)
experience
(1)
extra work
(1)
Facebook
(3)
family
(3)
fire
(1)
food
(1)
food journal
(1)
friends
(1)
Garcia Girls
(4)
George Orwell
(1)
global warming
(1)
god
(1)
government
(1)
grades
(3)
graduate school
(1)
graduation
(1)
group discussion
(1)
group projects
(1)
habits
(1)
happiness
(1)
high school
(2)
homework
(5)
hope
(1)
House on Mango Street
(1)
ideas
(1)
immigrant
(2)
industrial revolution
(1)
into the wild
(2)
issues
(1)
Jon Krakauer
(2)
journey
(1)
Julia Alvarez
(4)
justice
(1)
lazy
(1)
life
(1)
Los Angeles
(1)
love
(1)
meals
(1)
money
(1)
Ms. Valdez
(1)
murder
(1)
Myspace
(1)
nature
(1)
nervousness
(1)
night
(1)
nutritional value
(1)
Oakland
(1)
Oscar Grant
(1)
political power
(1)
positive
(1)
poverty
(1)
preparation
(1)
quality
(1)
Qwfwq
(1)
reading
(3)
reflection
(6)
religion
(2)
response
(13)
review
(3)
scientists
(1)
sex
(1)
sleep
(3)
social class
(1)
sophomore year
(1)
speech
(3)
stage fright
(2)
students
(2)
success
(2)
suffering
(1)
summer
(1)
symbol
(1)
syntax
(1)
taxes
(1)
teacher
(1)
the aquatic uncle
(1)
the dinosaurs
(1)
the four daughters
(1)
trust
(1)
university
(1)
victim
(1)
vignette
(1)
vocabulary
(1)
work
(2)
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Into the wild by Jon Krakauer book 2nd response/ review
Labels:
adventure,
Alaska,
death,
family,
group discussion,
into the wild,
Jon Krakauer,
life,
nature,
response,
review,
work
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment